diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 030e447..bd5b237 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -18,6 +18,18 @@ > > Older releases (v6.4.90 or older) has mismatch commit ID with this new repo, for reference to the exactly same commit, see [MBCP_VersionReference.md](MBCP_VersionReference.md) in repository. +## Checksum + +- More information about checksum measure : +
+ +- Since v6.5.15+, the checksum is more strict, see [this explain](/docs/checksum_newapp.md) for more details. + +- The checksum measure (which throws GW934 as response) is known enabled from the server-side (v6.4.64 works since days 0, but return with GW934 error after 11 days), it requires client (MBCP/MBBank) app to sent the SHA256 hash of 3 app libraries `libapp.so` | `libmbshield.so` | `libclosestmadagascar.so` and all of 5 dex files (classes1->5.dex) to the server for comparing hash, and if it doesn't match, the server will prevent the app from logging in with GW934 error : `Re-install app to continue using app.` +- The other function (eg: DigitalOTP) that works without logging in still works. + +
+ ## Introduction > Fact : MBCP / MBZDefend-Fix is my "hobby project", I maintain it in my free times :> @@ -338,15 +350,6 @@ Early note : When I created @mbbmod channel back in 2023, no one knows it for mo - [x] Adapt new v6.4.68 trungthu theme -## Old measure - -- More information about GW934 measure : -
- -- The `GW934` error is known enabled from the server-side (v6.4.64 works since days 0, but return with GW934 error after 11 days), it requires client (MBCP/MBBank) app to sent the SHA256 hash of 3 app libraries `libapp.so` | `libmbshield.so` | `libclosestmadagascar.so` and all of 5 dex files (classes1->5.dex) to the server for comparing hash, and if it doesn't match, the server will prevent the app from logging in with GW934 error : `Re-install app to continue using app.` -- The other function (eg: DigitalOTP) that works without logging in still works. - -
## Credits - [apktool](https://github.com/iBotPeaches/Apktool) diff --git a/docs/checksum_newapp.md b/docs/checksum_newapp.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..553d891 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/checksum_newapp.md @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ + + +# MBBank v6.5.15+ checksum list + +in first day of v6.5.15+ released, there is no such checksum, it still the same as before, only until 4 days since release, there is toggle in backend that enable the check, remain unaffected for older base + +same as v6.4.63+, in first day nothing happens, no checksum, but after 9 days, checksum appears. + +if one of these is modified (even one bit) will trigger checksum fail that refuse to accept login from + +all of this is both app & server side, server side ask for checksum, the client get sha256 hash and send to server side `getSHFiles` and if something mismatch, the server side will refuse to login and return GW934 as response to app + +```shell +# outside assets (v6.5.15+) +mb.apk/AndroidManifest.xml +mb.apk/lib/arm64-v8a/*.so # previously is libapp / zshield & zdefend libs only since v6.4.63+ +mb.apk/lib/armeabi-v7a/*.so # previously is libapp / zshield & zdefend libs only since v6.4.63+ +mb.apk/classes*.dex # since v6.4.63+ + +# in assets +# zimperium (v6.5.15+) +mb.apk/assets/zimperium_local_model_randomized_filename* +mb.apk/assets/zimperium_encrypted_dex_folder/*.odex +mb.apk/assets/*.szip # zshield encrypted files + +# vkey vtap (v6.5.15+) +mb.apk/assets/firmware # vkey vtap fw +mb.apk/assets/profile # vkey vtap profile +mb.apk/assets/signature # vtap vkey signature +mb.apk/version.json # vtap vkey vos info +mb.apk/voscodesign.vky +mb.apk/vkeylicensepack + +# singalarity ekyc files (v6.5.15+) +mb.apk/assets/sgprofile +mb.apk/assets/smart_ekyc_finall.zip +mb.apk/assets/media_init_data + +# flutter assets (v6.5.15+) +mb.apk/assets/flutter_assets/assets/fonts/* +mb.apk/assets/flutter_assets/fonts/* +mb.apk/assets/flutter_assets/FontManifest.json +``` \ No newline at end of file