Add APIs for getMultipathPreference and getRestrictBackgroundStatus.
Both are used by Connectivity to back the external
ConnectivityManager.getRestrictBackgroundStatus, and
ConnectivityManager.getMultipathPreference APIs.
Test: atest CtsNetTestCases
atest ConnectivityServiceTests
atest NetworkPolicyManagerServiceTest
Bug: 176289731
Change-Id: I8a03162b2f6691086bb64e75ffd354cdfca7f86a
Add more connectivity module settings and update all references
to ConnectivitySettingsManager.
Bug: 182538166
Test: atest FrameworksNetTests
Change-Id: Ie96fbd0996ed3acb37099b6270bf3d4c2e558e9a
ConnectivityManager will be a part of incoming connectivity
mainline. Settings will no longer to access the hidden methods.
For those methods that accept the interaction from users, they
should be exposed as formal interface to allow the
functionality. Expose them to API surface.
Bug: 172183305
Test: make update-api
Change-Id: Id4533b94291766bb060af0091b5ccb81a00630fd
ConnectivityManager and NetworkAgent do not share their handler with any
other component, so there is no reason to use addresses that do not
overlap. Protocol.BASE_* was written to allow for interaction "between
different StateMachine implementations without a conflict", but the
classes do not use StateMachine, and they do not have such interactions.
Bug: 177046265
Test: atest FrameworksNetTests
Change-Id: I18c341d4a2c01cb9559d682a9ad1ff259e6b5855
SystemServer cannot call the hidden API of ConnectivityManager
after it becomes a part of mainline module. So expose the hidden
API for SystemServer.
Bug: 182963354
Test: m services
Change-Id: I9c1dc8eb1401dbdc069d5c9fc3992f4c7939b70e
These constants are used by a MODULE_LIBRARIES API, they should
have the same visibility.
Test: ConnectivityServiceTest
Change-Id: I14cb189d949fe552f463cae3002801fd8cf8230c
* changes:
Remove per-user preference when the user is removed
Expose the enterprise per-profile networking API.
Implement setNetworkPreferenceForUser.
Public API for per-profile network preference.
Add tests for setNetworkPreferenceForUser
Chalard Jeanauthored and Gerrit Code Reviewcommited 2021-03-17 05:48:18 +00:00
This is done by:
1. In requestNetwork, provide a basic permission check.
2. rematchNetworksAndRequests: no change, since non listen
requests will be automatically processed to track
best satisfying network.
3. applyNetworkReassignment: no change, since non-request
will not be sent to factories.
Test: atest ConnectivityServiceTest#testRegisterBestMatchingNetworkCallback_noIssueToFactory
Test: atest ConnectivityServiceTest#testRegisterBestMatchingNetworkCallback_trackBestNetwork
Bug: 175662146
Change-Id: I8cf4ab334df6812d84cdda160e9b72b6f54062af
Also unify the listener for Oem settings, which have
never been released as public API (it is slated to be
released in S).
Test: FrameworksNetTests
Change-Id: I84ba363dd0ec03871c37b1c3a31e5557d9aa12e7
This patch defines the API, but does not make it public
yet as there is no implementation yet.
Test: none so far
Change-Id: I854a952dfe35cc80847eb62f522b1667b8e9b8a0
Context is more useful than ContentResolver, it can provide more
information if we want to change the behavior in the future.
Bug: 172183305
Test: atest FrameworksNetTests
Change-Id: I5702c7d74b862a76558b94f1abe2c6df9eb7f097
Merged-In: I5702c7d74b862a76558b94f1abe2c6df9eb7f097
lucaslinauthored and Lucas Lincommited 2021-03-16 09:26:57 +00:00
Context is more useful than ContentResolver, it can provide more
information if we want to change the behavior in the future.
Bug: 172183305
Test: atest FrameworksNetTests
Change-Id: I5702c7d74b862a76558b94f1abe2c6df9eb7f097
As attested by numerous TODOs in the code, a new way of
representing network quality and policy is needed instead
of an int.
An int representing the quality of the network requires
all parties using it to know how all other parties are
using it, and implementation details about the decision
algorithm. For all intents and purposes, the selection
is left to individual network factories who try to
achieve a desired result while piecing together all
possible states of the system.
As the number of such cases and desires increases, this
becomes both intractable and unmaintainable. Indeed, at
this time in the codebase nobody can really predict exactly
how a given change in score will affect selection across
the board, and it is essentially impossible to figure out
the behavior of network selection by inspecting the code
because the moving parts are scattered throughout the
entire codebase.
Having an object encapsulating policy and quality values
will let us centralize the selection and make it again
possible to maintain without knowledge of all behaviors
of all network factories. It will also provide better
guarantees of respecting policy, and allow bugfixes that
were not possible before because they'd touch too many
parts of the code.
Test: FrameworksNetTests FrameworksWifiTests NetworkStackTests
Change-Id: I3185a6412b9b659798faf0c6882699e9c63cc115
- Expose PRIVATE_DNS_MODE_OFF, PRIVATE_DNS_MODE_OPPORTUNISTIC and
PRIVATE_DNS_MODE_PROVIDER_HOSTNAME for external users.
- Since PRIVATE_DNS_DEFAULT_MODE_FALLBACK might be changed from
release to release, so it cannot be exposed as a system API.
Remove PRIVATE_DNS_DEFAULT_MODE_FALLBACK and have a new API -
getPrivateDnsMode() for users to get the private DNS mode instead.
Bug: 172183305
Test: atest FrameworksNetTests CtsNetTestCases
Change-Id: I02a1e91b4eafb5f5df3eada1c07b99849a050c3c
Merged-In: I02a1e91b4eafb5f5df3eada1c07b99849a050c3c
- Expose PRIVATE_DNS_MODE_OFF, PRIVATE_DNS_MODE_OPPORTUNISTIC and
PRIVATE_DNS_MODE_PROVIDER_HOSTNAME for external users.
- Since PRIVATE_DNS_DEFAULT_MODE_FALLBACK might be changed from
release to release, so it cannot be exposed as a system API.
Remove PRIVATE_DNS_DEFAULT_MODE_FALLBACK and have a new API -
getPrivateDnsMode() for users to get the private DNS mode instead.
Bug: 172183305
Test: atest FrameworksNetTests CtsNetTestCases
Test: atest com.android.cts.devicepolicy.DeviceOwnerTest#testPrivateDnsPolicy
Change-Id: I02a1e91b4eafb5f5df3eada1c07b99849a050c3c
Existing NetworkCallback users will get NetworkCapabilities with
location sensitive data removed (except for ownerUid which will be
added for existing apps for backwards compatibility). Apps
have to opt-in to receive location sensitive data.
Note: This was chosen because WifiInfo is the only TransportInfo tha
has location sensitive info & that was added only in Android 12. If we
choose to default to true, all existings apps retrieving
NetworkCapabilities for wifi networks will be blamed for location access
unnecessarily.
Changes:
i) Add a flag in NetworkCallback creation to retrieve
NetworkCapabilities with location sensitive info in their callback.
(More flags are being planned for NetworkCallback for throttling
callback frequency, etc)
ii) For NetworkCapabilities.getOwnerUid(), we will continue to send the
data for apps targeting older SDK (since this is an existing field and
the new flag defaults location sensitive data to off).
Bug: 156867433
Test: atest android.net
Test: atest com.android.server
Change-Id: If70b5ea6f5c8885f0c353c8df08a826d55fe7f7a
Lucas Lin
authored and
Automerger Merge Worker
commited 
Chiachang Wang
authored and
Chalard Jean
authored and
Paul Hu
commited 
Gerrit Code Review
commited 
Remi NGUYEN VAN
commited 
Junyu Lai
authored and
Android (Google) Code Review
commited 
Treehugger Robot
authored and
Roshan Pius
authored and