Since the feature was fully rolled out via experiment without
regression, this commit replaced with a
kill switch.
Flag: EXEMPT refactor
Test: atest ConnectivityCoverageTests:PrivateAddressCoordinatorTest
Fix: 312647670
Fix: 406955982
Change-Id: I18adcca45fa5f698adc80cea044d8006de097977
* changes:
Add integration test of tethering local network agent feature
Add unit test of tethering local network agent feature
Support LocalNetworkAgent for Tethering
Treehugger Robotauthored and Gerrit Code Reviewcommited 2025-03-21 07:42:40 -07:00
Allow carrier-privileged apps to call startTethering and stopTethering
for wifi tethering with a non-null SoftApConfiguration.
Bug: 295979433
Test: atest TetheringTests CtsTetheringTests
Change-Id: I7fae1964c44902b1d500729794fc59e5bdd185e5
Quang Anh Luongcommited 2025-03-21 18:25:28 +09:00
Allow DO apps to call startTethering and stopTethering for wifi
tethering with a non-null SoftApConfiguration.
Bug: 295979433
Test: atest TetheringTests CtsTetheringTests
Change-Id: Ie5836e9e30afb2df1de0640645d696e185aa2191
Quang Anh Luongauthored and Quang Luongcommited 2025-03-19 03:30:48 -07:00
Use WifiManager.startTetheredHotspot(TetheringRequest, Executor,
SoftApCallback) to start softap. This allows for passing in the
requested SoftApConfiguration via TetheringRequest.
Bug: 216524590
Test: atest TetheringTest TetheringManagerTest
Change-Id: Ie4fb851e8b2243d233f9a8b3e18e2fa335cec307
Quang Anh Luongcommited 2025-03-17 21:13:47 +09:00
TetheringTest has several tests that rely on starting Wifi tethering,
but do not mock WifiManager.startTetheredHotspot. This causes the
pending Wifi request to be removed, even though the test continues
thinking that the call succeeded and continues mocking Wifi AP events.
Fix this by making sure the mock returns true in setUp(), and only set
it to false when we expect that the call should fail.
Bug: 216524590
Test: atest TetheringTest
Change-Id: Iaf076b9ae64d737a8591c7f41a5552757b47999b
Quang Anh Luongcommited 2025-03-17 15:18:29 +09:00
isTetheringWithSoftApConfig flag is finalized, replace it with a simple
SdkLevel.isAtLeastB() check. This also fixes any issues with reading the
flag during boot.
Bug: 216524590
Test: covered by existing tests
Change-Id: I6c2717a68fa4f3c664c9948ec19b246db5afdb8b
Quang Anh Luongcommited 2025-03-17 15:18:29 +09:00
stopTethering with a TetheringRequest should only stop tethering if
there is an existing request (pending or serving) that fuzzy-matches the
input and whose UID matches the caller (unless the caller is Settings,
which is allowed to remove any request).
If there is no existing fuzzy-matched request, return
TETHER_ERROR_UNKNOWN_REQUEST.
Note: This was originally merged as aosp/3527440 but was reverted due to
a dependency CL being reverted. Remerging this on top of the fix for the
dependency CL.
Reverted changes: /q/submissionid:3541662-revert-3527440-JRJJTQBUFC
Bug: 216524590
Test: atest TetheringTest RequestTrackerTest TetheringManagerTest
Change-Id: I99dd2433efbb82f3721aa708ab50d198f6fbcb10
Quang Luongauthored and Quang Anh Luongcommited 2025-03-17 15:18:29 +09:00
Legacy behavior will return success results to multiple startTethering
calls of the same type, even though the link layer can only support one
of those requests at a time (other than tethered AP + LOHS).
For B+, clean up this behavior by only allowing the amount of requests
that the link layer can concurrently support. To do this, we'll
introduce the concept of "fuzzy-matching" such that if a new request
fuzzy-matches an existing request (either pending or serving), this
indicates that the link layer cannot support the new request
concurrently, and we'll fail the new request with
TETHER_ERROR_DUPLICATE_REQUEST.
To keep track of serving requests, we'll store the request and it's
IpServer in RequestTracker when we call IpServer.enable(), and we'll
remove it (indexed by IpServer) when
1) Calling IpServer.onStop()
2) Calling IpServer.unwanted()
3) We detect an IpServer transition to AvailableState with error code
Note: This was originally merged as aosp/3529632 but was reverted due to
a crash when reading aconfig flags at boot. That issue has been fixed
here.
Reverted changes: /q/submissionid:3541662-revert-3527440-JRJJTQBUFC
Bug: 216524590
Test: atest TetheringTest RequestTrackerTest TetheringManagerTest
Change-Id: I87a1ed31927cda27d3b7fdd7c823b8f828f8d777
Quang Luongauthored and Quang Anh Luongcommited 2025-03-17 15:18:29 +09:00
failureEnablingIpForwarding verifies that TetheringMetrics sends one
more error report than it should. This extra verification is caused by
any(class) being passed into the mock WifiManager.startTetheredHotspot,
which does not match null even though the actual code passes in a
null. This results in an extra failure that causes the extra error
report call.
Fix this by replacing any(class) with null, and removing the extra error
verification.
Bug: 216524590
Test: atest TetheringTest
Change-Id: I93986a999d573a186696e54793563e2be8405f39
Quang Anh Luongcommited 2025-03-15 10:42:22 +09:00
Revert submission 3527440
Reason for revert: Droidmonitor created revert due to b/403261952. Will be verifying through ABTD before submission.
Reverted changes: /q/submissionid:3527440
Change-Id: Ife596c639899528778f53fef797749fa88596dd6
Revert submission 3527440
Reason for revert: Droidmonitor created revert due to b/403261952. Will be verifying through ABTD before submission.
Reverted changes: /q/submissionid:3527440
Change-Id: I31ae861d5151c9db7e559ba19db7f07c9545d422
Priyanka Advani (xWF)authored and Gerrit Code Reviewcommited 2025-03-13 10:22:16 -07:00
stopTethering with a TetheringRequest should only stop tethering if
there is an existing request (pending or serving) that fuzzy-matches the
input and whose UID matches the caller (unless the caller is Settings,
which is allowed to remove any request).
If there is no existing fuzzy-matched request, return
TETHER_ERROR_UNKNOWN_REQUEST.
Bug: 216524590
Test: atest TetheringTest RequestTrackerTest TetheringManagerTest
Change-Id: Ia8a8eab78fbecd38321fd0d48734855cff16febb
Quang Anh Luongcommited 2025-03-13 12:49:08 +09:00
Legacy behavior will return success results to multiple startTethering
calls of the same type, even though the link layer can only support one
of those requests at a time (other than tethered AP + LOHS).
For B+, clean up this behavior by only allowing the amount of requests
that the link layer can concurrently support. To do this, we'll
introduce the concept of "fuzzy-matching" such that if a new request
fuzzy-matches an existing request (either pending or serving), this
indicates that the link layer cannot support the new request
concurrently, and we'll fail the new request with
TETHER_ERROR_DUPLICATE_REQUEST.
To keep track of serving requests, we'll store the request and it's
IpServer in RequestTracker when we call IpServer.enable(), and we'll
remove it (indexed by IpServer) when
1) Calling IpServer.onStop()
2) Calling IpServer.unwanted()
3) We detect an IpServer transition to AvailableState with error code
Bug: 216524590
Test: atest TetheringTest RequestTrackerTest TetheringManagerTest
Change-Id: I1e193f3595a48f806fb70fd08630a12ce2631a59
Quang Anh Luongcommited 2025-03-13 11:11:17 +09:00
Currently there may be multiple identical bluetooth requests waiting for
the PAN service to connect before their listeners are notified. To
simplify future code, we should only allow one pending request/listener
pair at a time, and reject every subsequent request with
TETHER_ERROR_SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE.
This should be OK because
1) Bluetooth tethering is hardly used at all
2) Settings disallows extra startTethering calls between the first call
and the bluetooth service starting
3) Apps are expected to handle TETHER_ERROR_SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE
correctly.
Bug: 216524590
Test: atest TetheringTest
Change-Id: I8375d495575715f428e893316f7cd7e5a7ebba59
Quang Anh Luongauthored and Quang Luongcommited 2025-03-10 21:02:50 -07:00
Mockito extended tends to cause all kinds of issues due to the way it
injects itself into the bytecode of framework classes instead of
creating subclasses.
Use non-extended mockito as it is not actually necessary for current
tests.
Test: atest
Change-Id: Id2874309cce2778c4405b852df9a3ae816c4abcb
The method has been replaced by verifyNo(More)Interactions
in later Mockito versions.
Test: m checkbuild
Flag: TEST_ONLY
Bug: 310268946
Change-Id: I57faa43a5f158bb131f64c19d93de99e04f257ca
Pending requests should be updated via a helper class RequestTracker
and stored in a Request wrapper object. This will help out with future
changes to associate each TetheringRequest with it's own
IIntResultListener and make it easier to gate behavior changes.
Bug: 216524590
Test: atest TetheringTest RequestTrackerTest
Change-Id: Ib867e91863bdf618bb0e955eeb529cd132209d77
Quang Anh Luongcommited 2025-03-06 15:18:28 +09:00
* changes:
no-op: use stopTetheringInternal when restarting tethering on start
Use pending request when legacy tethering
no-op: Add test to verify legacyTether does not use explicit request
Quang Luongauthored and Gerrit Code Reviewcommited 2025-03-04 02:25:35 -08:00
Legacy tethering was changed to use it's own tethering requests
with REQUEST_TYPE_LEGACY in aosp/3465235 instead of using the pending
request as it was thought that pending requests (from startTethering)
and legacy tethering would always be mutually exclusive.
However, pre-T Bluetooth tethering actually relies on
startTethering(request) to add the pending request, and then BT service
directly calls legacyTether(iface) to start tethering. Thus we should
continue to use pending requests even for legacyTether.
Bug: 216524590
Test: atest TetheringTest
Change-Id: I0aa7b5cc6d6d54f516a07b0e89259c61e1d05f69
Quang Anh Luongcommited 2025-03-04 16:58:42 +09:00
Add a test that verifies that legacyTether will not use the
explicit pending TetheringRequest set by startTethering.
Bug: 216524590
Test: atest TetheringTest
Change-Id: I3e0638a3c60cdf3b73b1accc136ed7098e7b48f6
Quang Anh Luongcommited 2025-03-04 16:58:40 +09:00
The tether_enable_sync_sm flag has been successfully rolled out
to public stage on Pixel devices without any observed
regressions. As a result, this flag should be enabled by default
with a kill switch, allowing the feature to be deployed to all
production devices.
Test: atest TetheringTests CtsTetheringTest
Change-Id: I2f0f55c1586e1f4987b28488082c4c1f4cae0f5e
Since the feature was fully rolled out via experiment without
regression, this commit removes the flag and the corresponding
logic in PrivateAddressCoordinator. The flag is no longer
necessary and simplifies the code.
Test: atest ConnectivityCoverageTests:PrivateAddressCoordinatorTest
Fix: 312647670
Change-Id: I8781f98b7e99ed0856e9e04112056df5adca2527
Junyu Lai
commited 
Paul Hu
authored and
Automerger Merge Worker
commited 
Gerrit Code Review
commited 
Treehugger Robot
authored and
Quang Anh Luong
commited 
Priyanka Advani (xWF)
authored and
Remi NGUYEN VAN
authored and
Adrian Roos
authored and
Android (Google) Code Review
commited