* 'core/softirq' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip:
softirq: remove irqs_disabled warning from local_bh_enable
softirq: remove initialization of static per-cpu variable
Remove argument from open_softirq which is always NULL
* 'sched/new-API-sched_setscheduler' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip:
sched: add new API sched_setscheduler_nocheck: add a flag to control access checks
Clean up __migrate_task(): to just have separate "done" and "fail"
cases, instead of that "out" case with random error behavior.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Linus Torvaldsauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-10 20:39:58 +02:00
I think we may have a race between try_to_wake_up() and
migrate_live_tasks() -> move_task_off_dead_cpu() when the later one
may end up looping endlessly.
Interrupts are enabled on other CPUs when migration_call(CPU_DEAD, ...) is
called so we may get a race between try_to_wake_up() and
migrate_live_tasks() -> move_task_off_dead_cpu(). The former one may push
a task out of a dead CPU causing the later one to loop endlessly.
Heiko Carstens observed:
| That's exactly what explains a dump I got yesterday. Thanks for fixing! :)
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
Cc: miaox@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Dmitry Adamushkoauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-10 09:35:34 +02:00
* Replace usages of MAX_NUMNODES with nr_node_ids in kernel/sched.c,
where appropriate. This saves some allocated space as well as many
wasted cycles going through node entries that are non-existent.
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Mike Travisauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-08 11:31:30 +02:00
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:27:14PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 10:50 +0530, Ankita Garg wrote:
>
> > Thanks Peter for the explanation...
> >
> > I agree with the above and that is the reason why I did not see weird
> > values with cpu_time. But, run_delay still would suffer skews as the end
> > points for delta could be taken on different cpus due to migration (more
> > so on RT kernel due to the push-pull operations). With the below patch,
> > I could not reproduce the issue I had seen earlier. After every dequeue,
> > we take the delta and start wait measurements from zero when moved to a
> > different rq.
>
> OK, so task delay delay accounting is broken because it doesn't take
> migration into account.
>
> What you've done is make it symmetric wrt enqueue, and account it like
>
> cpu0 cpu1
>
> enqueue
> <wait-d1>
> dequeue
> enqueue
> <wait-d2>
> run
>
> Where you add both d1 and d2 to the run_delay,.. right?
>
Thanks for reviewing the patch. The above is exactly what I have done.
> This seems like a good fix, however it looks like the patch will break
> compilation in !CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS && !CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT, of it
> failing to provide a stub for sched_info_dequeue() in that case.
Fixed. Pl. find the new patch below.
Signed-off-by: Ankita Garg <ankita@in.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: suresh.b.siddha@intel.com
Cc: aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: David Bahi <DBahi@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Ankita Gargauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-04 12:50:23 +02:00
We have the notion of tracking process-coupling (a.k.a. buddy-wake) via
the p->se.last_wake / p->se.avg_overlap facilities, but it is only used
for cfs to cfs interactions. There is no reason why an rt to cfs
interaction cannot share in establishing a relationhip in a similar
manner.
Because PREEMPT_RT runs many kernel threads as FIFO priority, we often
times have heavy interaction between RT threads waking CFS applications.
This patch offers a substantial boost (50-60%+) in perfomance under those
circumstances.
Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Cc: npiggin@suse.de
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Gregory Haskinsauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-04 12:50:22 +02:00
This patch fixes the following warning:
kernel/sched.c:1667: warning: 'cfs_rq_set_shares' defined but not used
This seems the correct way to fix this; cfs_rq_set_shares() is only used
in a single place, which is also inside #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED.
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Vegard Nossumauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-06-30 08:37:32 +02:00
fix:
kernel/sched.c: In function ‘sched_group_set_shares':
kernel/sched.c:8635: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cfs_rq_set_shares'
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
the CPU hotplug problems (crashes under high-volume unplug+replug
tests) seem to be related to migrate_dead_tasks().
Firstly I added traces to see all tasks being migrated with
migrate_live_tasks() and migrate_dead_tasks(). On my setup the problem
pops up (the one with "se == NULL" in the loop of
pick_next_task_fair()) shortly after the traces indicate that some has
been migrated with migrate_dead_tasks()). btw., I can reproduce it
much faster now with just a plain cpu down/up loop.
[disclaimer] Well, unless I'm really missing something important in
this late hour [/desclaimer] pick_next_task() is not something
appropriate for migrate_dead_tasks() :-)
the following change seems to eliminate the problem on my setup
(although, I kept it running only for a few minutes to get a few
messages indicating migrate_dead_tasks() does move tasks and the
system is still ok)
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Dmitry Adamushkoauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-06-29 08:50:21 +02:00
Increase the accuracy of the effective_load values.
Not only consider the current increment (as per the attempted wakeup), but
also consider the delta between when we last adjusted the shares and the
current situation.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Peter Zijlstraauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-06-27 14:31:47 +02:00
We found that the affine wakeup code needs rather accurate load figures
to be effective. The trouble is that updating the load figures is fairly
expensive with group scheduling. Therefore ratelimit the updating.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Peter Zijlstraauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-06-27 14:31:45 +02:00
In case the domain is empty, pretend there is a single task on each cpu, so
that together with the boost logic we end up giving 1/n shares to each
cpu.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Peter Zijlstraauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-06-27 14:31:44 +02:00
The bias given by source/target_load functions can be very large, disable
it by default to get faster convergence.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Peter Zijlstraauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-06-27 14:31:44 +02:00
Priority looses much of its meaning in a hierarchical context. So don't
use it in balance decisions.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Peter Zijlstraauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-06-27 14:31:42 +02:00
find_busiest_group() has some assumptions about task weight being in the
NICE_0_LOAD range. Hierarchical task groups break this assumption - fix this
by replacing it with the average task weight, which will adapt the situation.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Peter Zijlstraauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-06-27 14:31:40 +02:00
Remove the fall-back to SCHED_LOAD_SCALE by remembering the previous value of
cpu_avg_load_per_task() - this is useful because of the hierarchical group
model in which task weight can be much smaller.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Peter Zijlstraauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-06-27 14:31:39 +02:00
Finding the least idle cpu is more accurate when done with updated shares.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Peter Zijlstraauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-06-27 14:31:38 +02:00
Re-compute the shares on newidle - so we can make a decision based on
recent data.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Peter Zijlstraauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-06-27 14:31:37 +02:00
While thinking about the previous patch - I realized that using per domain
aggregate load values in load_balance_fair() is wrong. We should use the
load value for that CPU.
By not needing per domain hierarchical load values we don't need to store
per domain aggregate shares, which greatly simplifies all the math.
It basically falls apart in two separate computations:
- per domain update of the shares
- per CPU update of the hierarchical load
Also get rid of the move_group_shares() stuff - just re-compute the shares
again after a successful load balance.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Peter Zijlstraauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-06-27 14:31:36 +02:00
We only need to know the task_weight of the busiest rq - nothing to do
if there are no tasks there.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Peter Zijlstraauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-06-27 14:31:35 +02:00
We used to try and contain the loss of 'shares' by playing arithmetic
games. Replace that by noticing that at the top sched_domain we'll
always have the full weight in shares to distribute.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Peter Zijlstraauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-06-27 14:31:34 +02:00
It was observed that in __update_group_shares_cpu()
rq_weight > aggregate()->rq_weight
This is caused by forks/wakeups in between the initial aggregate pass and
locking of the RQs for load balance. To avoid this situation partially re-do
the aggregation once we have the RQs locked (which avoids new tasks from
appearing).
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Peter Zijlstraauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-06-27 14:31:33 +02:00
Keeping the aggregate on the first cpu of the sched domain has two problems:
- it could collide between different sched domains on different cpus
- it could slow things down because of the remote accesses
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Peter Zijlstraauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-06-27 14:31:32 +02:00
Uncouple buddy selection from wakeup granularity.
The initial idea was that buddies could run ahead as far as a normal task
can - do this by measuring a pair 'slice' just as we do for a normal task.
This means we can drop the wakeup_granularity back to 5ms.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Peter Zijlstraauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-06-27 14:31:31 +02:00
with sched_clock_cpu() being reasonably in sync between cpus (max 1 jiffy
difference) use this to provide cpu_clock().
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Peter Zijlstraauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-06-27 14:31:30 +02:00
Hidehiro Kawai noticed that sched_setscheduler() can fail in
stop_machine: it calls sched_setscheduler() from insmod, which can
have CAP_SYS_MODULE without CAP_SYS_NICE.
Two cases could have failed, so are changed to sched_setscheduler_nocheck:
kernel/softirq.c:cpu_callback()
- CPU hotplug callback
kernel/stop_machine.c:__stop_machine_run()
- Called from various places, including modprobe()
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: sugita <yumiko.sugita.yf@hitachi.com>
Cc: Satoshi OSHIMA <satoshi.oshima.fk@hitachi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Rusty Russellauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-06-23 22:57:56 +02:00
* 'core-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip:
softlockup: fix NMI hangs due to lock race - 2.6.26-rc regression
rcupreempt: remove export of rcu_batches_completed_bh
cpuset: limit the input of cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level
Simplify the code and fix the boundary condition of
wait_for_completion_timeout(,0).
We can kill the first __remove_wait_queue() as well.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Oleg Nesterovauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-06-20 17:15:49 +02:00
It seems that the current implementaton of wait_for_completion_timeout()
has a small problem under very high load for the common pattern:
if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&done, timeout))
/* handle failure */
because the implementation very roughly does (lots of code deleted to
show the basic flow):
static inline long __sched
do_wait_for_common(struct completion *x, long timeout, int state)
{
if (x->done)
return timeout;
do {
timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
if (!timeout)
return timeout;
} while (!x->done);
return timeout;
}
so if the system is very busy and x->done is not set when
do_wait_for_common() is entered, it is possible that the first call to
schedule_timeout() returns 0 because the task doing wait_for_completion
doesn't get rescheduled for a long time, even if it is woken up early
enough.
In this case, wait_for_completion_timeout() returns 0 without even
checking x->done again, and the code above falls into its failure case
purely for scheduler reasons, even if the hardware event or whatever was
being waited for happened early enough.
It would make sense to add an extra test to do_wait_for() in the timeout
case and return 1 if x->done is actually set.
A quick audit (not exhaustive) of wait_for_completion_timeout() callers
seems to indicate that no one actually cares about the return value in
the success case -- they just test for 0 (timed out) versus non-zero
(wait succeeded).
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Roland Dreierauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-06-20 13:19:32 +02:00
Linus Torvalds
commited 
Ingo Molnar
commited 
Dmitry Adamushko
authored and
Mike Travis
authored and
Ankita Garg
authored and
Gregory Haskins
authored and
Raistlin
authored and
Vegard Nossum
authored and
Peter Zijlstra
authored and
Rusty Russell
authored and
Oleg Nesterov
authored and
Roland Dreier
authored and