NR_IRQS: let VISWS be just a sub-case of the generic code.
This can create a somewhat larger irq_desc[] array if NR_CPUS is high
but that should not worry VisWS which has 4 CPUs at most.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
move the SGIVW definitions from setup_arch.h into its own header file.
preparation for turning VISWS into a generic PC architecture.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
move the include/asm-x86/mach-visws/ VISWS specific hardware
details include files into include/asm-x86/visws, to be used from
generic code.
No code changed.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
update asm-x86/mach-visws/mach_apicdef.h to the generic version.
This should work fine as VISWS has a standard local APIC and thus
its mach_apicdef.h copy is just an ancient version of the generic code.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
now that include/asm-x86/mach-visws/smpboot_hooks.h equals
to the default file in ../mach-default/smpboot_hooks.h, simply
include it instead of maintaining a copy.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
update include/asm-x86/mach-visws/smpboot_hooks.h to
include/asm-x86/mach-default/smpboot_hooks.h (the generic version).
this _should_ work, because VISWS sets skip_ioapic_setup, but it
should be tested on a real VISWS to make sure.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Allow the generic smpboot quirks code to be built with
ONFIG_X86_IO_APIC disabled. This way VISWS will be able
to use it as-is.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
now that include/asm-x86/mach-visws/mach_apic.h equals
to include/asm-x86/mach-default/mach_apic.h, simply start
using the generic one.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Add early quirks support.
In preparation of enabling the generic architecture to boot on a VISWS.
This will allow us to remove the VISWS subarch and all its complications.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This remove lots of duplications in iommu.h and gart.h.
The end result of this patch is:
- iommu.h is a header file for everyone related with IOMMUs.
- gart.h is the private header file. Only pci-gart_64.c and its friends
include it.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
FUJITA Tomonoriauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-10 10:43:26 +02:00
and let 64-bit to fall back to use fixmap too.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Yinghai Luauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-10 09:01:25 +02:00
fix:
arch/x86/kernel/built-in.o: In function `dmi_ignore_irq0_timer_override':
boot.c:(.init.text+0x3ea4): undefined reference to `force_mask_ioapic_irq_2'
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
The problems are that, with the ACPI vs timer overring issue _fixed_,
after using the box for some time (between several seconds and 1 hour, at
random) processes get very high CPU loads (once I've got X using 107% of
the CPU, for example) and the system becomes unresponsive, as though there
were interrupts lost or something similar.
Andreas Herrman reproduced similar problems:
> Ok, now I've reproduced the stability problem.
> - Using tip/master,
> - reverting e38502eb8aa82314d5ab0eba45f50e6790dadd88 and
> - applying your patch from this posting
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121539354224562&w=4
>
> Starting X, firefox, gimp, tuxpaint and doing some drawing in tuxpaint
> results in a slow system. Drawing is almost not possible anymore --
> Selections of new colors, cursors etc. is performed with huge delay
> if it's performed at all.
>
> BTW, the code sets up timer IRQ as Virtual Wire IRQ:
>
> Jul 8 14:57:58 kodscha IO-APIC (apicid-pin) 2-22, 2-23 not connected.
> Jul 8 14:57:58 kodscha ..TIMER: vector=0x30 apic1=0 pin1=2 apic2=-1 pin2=-1
> Jul 8 14:57:58 kodscha ...trying to set up timer as Virtual Wire IRQ... works.
>
> and both INT0 and INT2 of IOAPIC are masked:
>
> Jul 8 14:57:58 kodscha NR Dst Mask Trig IRR Pol Stat Dmod Deli Vect:
> Jul 8 14:57:58 kodscha 00 000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
> Jul 8 14:57:58 kodscha 01 003 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 31
> Jul 8 14:57:58 kodscha 02 003 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 30
>
> I've also seen strange CPU utilization -- with syslog-ng:
>
> top - 15:33:06 up 35 min, 4 users, load average: 1.70, 0.68, 0.37
> Tasks: 64 total, 4 running, 60 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
> Cpu0 : 0.0%us,100.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu1 : 6.4%us, 87.2%sy, 0.0%ni, 5.8%id, 0.0%wa, 0.6%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Mem: 895384k total, 283568k used, 611816k free, 35492k buffers
> Swap: 1959920k total, 0k used, 1959920k free, 163044k cached
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
> 4632 root 20 0 17216 800 580 S 104 0.1 0:34.22 syslog-ng
> 28505 root 20 0 205m 11m 4024 S 6 1.3 0:21.16 X
> 28518 root 20 0 56292 5652 4492 S 1 0.6 0:01.80 fluxbox
> 1 root 20 0 3724 608 508 S 0 0.1 0:00.36 init
>
> So far I have no clue why C1E-idle in conjunction with virtual wire
> mode causes this strange behaviour.
>
> ... and I start to think about the root cause of all this.
>
> I've performed similar tests under X with the IRQ0/INT0 configuration and
> I did not see above symptoms.
So lets fall back to the IRQ0/INT0 configuration on this box.
This basically restores the dont-use-the-lapic-timer exception mechanism
that was unconditional on this box prior commit 8750bf5 ("x86: add C1E
aware idle function").
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Rafael J. Wysockiauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-09 11:03:21 +02:00
Hmm, looks like it would be nice to have more cleanups of iommu.h and
gart.h.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
FUJITA Tomonoriauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-09 10:53:13 +02:00
When system have 4g less ram installed, and acpi table sit
near end of ram, make max_pfn cover them too,
so 64bit kernel don't need to mess up fixmap.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: "Suresh Siddha" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Yinghai Luauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-09 10:43:25 +02:00
Remove them from the arch-specific file.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Glauber Costaauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-09 09:14:29 +02:00
x86_64 does not need it, but it won't have X86_INTEL_USERCOPY
defined either.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Glauber Costaauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-09 09:14:28 +02:00
We also carry the unaligned version with us. Only x86_64 uses
it, but there's no problem in defining it.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Glauber Costaauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-09 09:14:27 +02:00
Move both versions, which are highly similar, to uaccess.h.
Note that, for x86_64, X86_WP_WORKS_OK is always defined.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Glauber Costaauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-09 09:14:26 +02:00
We also check user pointer in x86_64 put_user, the way i386 does.
In a separate patch for bisecting purposes.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Glauber Costaauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-09 09:14:26 +02:00
For both __put_user_x and __put_user_8 macros, pass the error
variable explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Glauber Costaauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-09 09:14:25 +02:00
Move __get_user_asm and __get_user_size and __get_user_nocheck
to uaccess.h. This requires us to define a macro at __get_user_size
for the 64-bit access case.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Glauber Costaauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-09 09:14:24 +02:00
Let the user of the macro specify the desired return.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Glauber Costaauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-09 09:14:23 +02:00
Move both __put_user_asm and __put_user_size to
uaccess.h. i386 already had a special function for 64-bit access,
so for x86_64, we just define a macro with the same name.
Note that for X86_64, CONFIG_X86_WP_WORKS_OK will always
be defined, so the #else part will never be even compiled in.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Glauber Costaauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-09 09:14:22 +02:00
Let the user of the macro specify the desired return.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Glauber Costaauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-09 09:14:22 +02:00
Do it in a separate patch for bisectability.
Goal is to have put_user_size integrated.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Glauber Costaauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-09 09:14:20 +02:00
Take it out of uaccess_32.h. Since it seems that no users
of the x86_64 exists, we simply pick the i386 version.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Glauber Costaauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-09 09:14:19 +02:00
Merge versions of getuser from uaccess_32.h and uaccess_64.h into
uaccess.h. There is a part which is 64-bit only (for now), and for
that, we use a __get_user_8 macro.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Glauber Costaauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-09 09:14:18 +02:00
Common parts of uaccess_32.h and uaccess_64.h
are put in uaccess.h. Bits in uaccess_32.h and
uaccess_64.h that come to this file are equal
except for comments and whitespaces differences.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Glauber Costaauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-09 09:14:18 +02:00
Using explicit hexa (0xFFFFFFUL) introduces an unnecessary difference
between i386 and x86_64 because of the size of their long. Use -1UL instead.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Glauber Costaauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-09 09:14:17 +02:00
Do not refer to the processor word-size with int, as it won't
work with x86_64. Use long instead.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Glauber Costaauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-09 09:14:16 +02:00
Put the likely hint in access_ok. Just for
bisectability.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Glauber Costaauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-09 09:14:15 +02:00
Our integration efforts broke a build with this function being used
with i386. Reason is "g" can put the operand in an imm32, which according
to The Book (tm), is invalid as the second operand.
This is actually a bug
in x86_64 too, since the x86_64 instruction set reference does not list
it as valid.
We probably didn't trigger this before due to the ammount of
registers available for 64-bit platforms. But that's just my guess.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Glauber Costaauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-09 09:14:14 +02:00
For i386, __range_not_ok is a better name than __range_ok, since
it returns 0 when it is in fact okay. Other than that,
both versions does not need the word size specifiers, and we remove them.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Glauber Costaauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-09 09:14:13 +02:00
In putuser_32.S and putuser_64.S, replace things like .quad, .long,
and explicit references to [r|e]ax for the apropriate macros
in asm/asm.h.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Glauber Costaauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-09 09:14:12 +02:00
This is consistent with i386 usage.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Glauber Costaauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-09 09:14:08 +02:00
Instead of clobbering r8, clobber rbx, which is the i386 way.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Glauber Costaauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-09 09:14:08 +02:00
Follow the pattern, and define a single put_user_x, instead
of defining macros for all available sizes. Exception is
put_user_8, since the "A" constraint does not give us enough
power to specify which register (a or d) to use in the 32-bit
common case.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Glauber Costaauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-09 09:14:07 +02:00
Clobber it in the inline asm macros, and let the compiler do this for us.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Glauber Costaauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-09 09:14:06 +02:00
getuser_32.S and getuser_64.S are merged into getuser.S.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Glauber Costaauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-09 09:14:05 +02:00
There are situations in which the architecture wants to use the
register that represents its word-size, whatever it is. For those,
introduce __ASM_REG in asm.h, along with the first users _ASM_AX
and _ASM_DX. They have users waiting for it, namely the getuser
functions.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Glauber Costaauthored and Ingo Molnarcommited 2008-07-09 09:14:04 +02:00
Ingo Molnar
commited 
FUJITA Tomonori
authored and
Yinghai Lu
authored and
Vitaly Mayatskikh
authored and
Rafael J. Wysocki
authored and
Glauber Costa
authored and