| SHA1 | ||
|---|---|---|
It is better not to think about compute capacity as being equivalent to "CPU power". The upcoming "power aware" scheduler work may create confusion with the notion of energy consumption if "power" is used too liberally. Let's rename the following feature flags since they do relate to capacity: SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER -> SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY ARCH_POWER -> ARCH_CAPACITY NONTASK_POWER -> NONTASK_CAPACITY Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org Cc: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com> Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> Cc: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Cc: Vasant Hegde <hegdevasant@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-e93lpnxb87owfievqatey6b5@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> 
Nicolas Pitre
authored and
 Ingo Molnar
commited |
5d4dfddd4f | |
Just as "sched: Favour moving tasks towards the preferred node" favours moving tasks towards nodes with a higher number of recorded NUMA hinting faults, this patch resists moving tasks towards nodes with lower faults. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1381141781-10992-24-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> 
Mel Gorman
authored and
Ingo Molnar
commited |
7a0f308337 | |
This patch favours moving tasks towards NUMA node that recorded a higher number of NUMA faults during active load balancing. Ideally this is self-reinforcing as the longer the task runs on that node, the more faults it should incur causing task_numa_placement to keep the task running on that node. In reality a big weakness is that the nodes CPUs can be overloaded and it would be more efficient to queue tasks on an idle node and migrate to the new node. This would require additional smarts in the balancer so for now the balancer will simply prefer to place the task on the preferred node for a PTE scans which is controlled by the numa_balancing_settle_count sysctl. Once the settle_count number of scans has complete the schedule is free to place the task on an alternative node if the load is imbalanced. [srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com: Fixed statistics] Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [ Tunable and use higher faults instead of preferred. ] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1381141781-10992-23-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Mel Gorman
authored and
Ingo Molnar
commited |
3a7053b322 | |
PTE scanning and NUMA hinting fault handling is expensive so commit
Mel Gorman
authored and
Ingo Molnar
commited |
b726b7dfb4 | |
As mentioned by Ingo, the SCHED_FEAT_OWNER_SPIN scheduler feature bit was really just an early hack to make with/without mutex-spinning testable. So it is no longer necessary. This patch removes the SCHED_FEAT_OWNER_SPIN feature bit and move the mutex spinning code from kernel/sched/core.c back to kernel/mutex.c which is where they should belong. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Chandramouleeswaran Aswin <aswin@hp.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com> Cc: Norton Scott J <scott.norton@hp.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1366226594-5506-2-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> 
Waiman Long
authored and
Ingo Molnar
commited |
41fcb9f230 | |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)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=ivQa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'balancenuma-v11' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mel/linux-balancenuma
Pull Automatic NUMA Balancing bare-bones from Mel Gorman:
"There are three implementations for NUMA balancing, this tree
(balancenuma), numacore which has been developed in tip/master and
autonuma which is in aa.git.
In almost all respects balancenuma is the dumbest of the three because
its main impact is on the VM side with no attempt to be smart about
scheduling. In the interest of getting the ball rolling, it would be
desirable to see this much merged for 3.8 with the view to building
scheduler smarts on top and adapting the VM where required for 3.9.
The most recent set of comparisons available from different people are
mel: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/9/108
mingo: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/7/331
tglx: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/10/437
srikar: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/10/397
The results are a mixed bag. In my own tests, balancenuma does
reasonably well. It's dumb as rocks and does not regress against
mainline. On the other hand, Ingo's tests shows that balancenuma is
incapable of converging for this workloads driven by perf which is bad
but is potentially explained by the lack of scheduler smarts. Thomas'
results show balancenuma improves on mainline but falls far short of
numacore or autonuma. Srikar's results indicate we all suffer on a
large machine with imbalanced node sizes.
My own testing showed that recent numacore results have improved
dramatically, particularly in the last week but not universally.
We've butted heads heavily on system CPU usage and high levels of
migration even when it shows that overall performance is better.
There are also cases where it regresses. Of interest is that for
specjbb in some configurations it will regress for lower numbers of
warehouses and show gains for higher numbers which is not reported by
the tool by default and sometimes missed in treports. Recently I
reported for numacore that the JVM was crashing with
NullPointerExceptions but currently it's unclear what the source of
this problem is. Initially I thought it was in how numacore batch
handles PTEs but I'm no longer think this is the case. It's possible
numacore is just able to trigger it due to higher rates of migration.
These reports were quite late in the cycle so I/we would like to start
with this tree as it contains much of the code we can agree on and has
not changed significantly over the last 2-3 weeks."
* tag 'balancenuma-v11' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mel/linux-balancenuma: (50 commits)
mm/rmap, migration: Make rmap_walk_anon() and try_to_unmap_anon() more scalable
mm/rmap: Convert the struct anon_vma::mutex to an rwsem
mm: migrate: Account a transhuge page properly when rate limiting
mm: numa: Account for failed allocations and isolations as migration failures
mm: numa: Add THP migration for the NUMA working set scanning fault case build fix
mm: numa: Add THP migration for the NUMA working set scanning fault case.
mm: sched: numa: Delay PTE scanning until a task is scheduled on a new node
mm: sched: numa: Control enabling and disabling of NUMA balancing if !SCHED_DEBUG
mm: sched: numa: Control enabling and disabling of NUMA balancing
mm: sched: Adapt the scanning rate if a NUMA hinting fault does not migrate
mm: numa: Use a two-stage filter to restrict pages being migrated for unlikely task<->node relationships
mm: numa: migrate: Set last_nid on newly allocated page
mm: numa: split_huge_page: Transfer last_nid on tail page
mm: numa: Introduce last_nid to the page frame
sched: numa: Slowly increase the scanning period as NUMA faults are handled
mm: numa: Rate limit setting of pte_numa if node is saturated
mm: numa: Rate limit the amount of memory that is migrated between nodes
mm: numa: Structures for Migrate On Fault per NUMA migration rate limiting
mm: numa: Migrate pages handled during a pmd_numa hinting fault
mm: numa: Migrate on reference policy
...
Linus Torvalds
commited |
3d59eebc5e | |
Due to the fact that migrations are driven by the CPU a task is running on there is no point tracking NUMA faults until one task runs on a new node. This patch tracks the first node used by an address space. Until it changes, PTE scanning is disabled and no NUMA hinting faults are trapped. This should help workloads that are short-lived, do not care about NUMA placement or have bound themselves to a single node. This takes advantage of the logic in "mm: sched: numa: Implement slow start for working set sampling" to delay when the checks are made. This will take advantage of processes that set their CPU and node bindings early in their lifetime. It will also potentially allow any initial load balancing to take place. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Mel Gorman
commited |
5bca230353 | |
This patch adds Kconfig options and kernel parameters to allow the enabling and disabling of automatic NUMA balancing. The existance of such a switch was and is very important when debugging problems related to transparent hugepages and we should have the same for automatic NUMA placement. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Mel Gorman
commited |
1a687c2e9a | |
NOTE: This patch is based on "sched, numa, mm: Add fault driven placement and migration policy" but as it throws away all the policy to just leave a basic foundation I had to drop the signed-offs-by. This patch creates a bare-bones method for setting PTEs pte_numa in the context of the scheduler that when faulted later will be faulted onto the node the CPU is running on. In itself this does nothing useful but any placement policy will fundamentally depend on receiving hints on placement from fault context and doing something intelligent about it. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> 
Peter Zijlstra
authored and
Mel Gorman
commited |
cbee9f88ec | |
As per the recent discussion with Mike and Linus, make it easier to test with/without this feature. No change in default behavior. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-izoxq4haeg4mTognnDbwcevt@git.kernel.org 
Ingo Molnar
commited |
8ed92e51f9 | |
Heteregeneous ARM platform uses arch_scale_freq_power function to reflect the relative capacity of each core Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1341826026-6504-6-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> 
Vincent Guittot
authored and
Ingo Molnar
commited |
bc2a27cd27 | |
Commit
Namhyung Kim
authored and
Ingo Molnar
commited |
c751134ef8 | |
Commits
Peter Zijlstra
authored and
Ingo Molnar
commited |
eb95308ee2 | |
Now that we initialize jump_labels before sched_init() we can use them for the debug features without having to worry about a window where they have the wrong setting. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-vpreo4hal9e0kzqmg5y0io2k@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Peter Zijlstra
authored and
Ingo Molnar
commited |
f8b6d1cc7d | |
There's too many sched*.[ch] files in kernel/, give them their own directory. (No code changed, other than Makefile glue added.) Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Peter Zijlstra
authored and
Ingo Molnar
commited |
391e43da79 |
Renamed from kernel/sched_features.h (Browse further)