There were two issues here:
- writeback thread did not start until the device first became dirty
- writeback thread used uninterruptible sleep once running
Without this patch I see kernel warnings printed and a load average of
1.52 after booting my test VM. With this patch the warnings are gone and
the load average is near 0.00 as expected.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Slava Pestovauthored and Kent Overstreetcommited 2014-08-04 15:23:03 -07:00
This simplifies the writeback flow control quite a bit - previously, it
was conceptually two coroutines, refill_dirty() and read_dirty(). This
makes the code quite a bit more straightforward.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Kent Overstreetcommited 2013-11-10 21:56:05 -08:00
Originally I got this right... except that the divides didn't use
do_div(), which broke 32 bit kernels. When I went to fix that, I forgot
that the raid stripe size usually isn't a power of two... doh
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Kent Overstreetcommited 2013-11-10 21:55:55 -08:00
Now that we're tracking dirty data per stripe, we can add two
optimizations for raid5/6:
* If a stripe is already dirty, force writes to that stripe to
writeback mode - to help build up full stripes of dirty data
* When flushing dirty data, preferentially write out full stripes first
if there are any.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
Kent Overstreetcommited 2013-06-26 21:58:04 -07:00
To make background writeback aware of raid5/6 stripes, we first need to
track the amount of dirty data within each stripe - we do this by
breaking up the existing sectors_dirty into per stripe atomic_ts
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
Kent Overstreetcommited 2013-06-26 21:57:23 -07:00
Slava Pestov
authored and
Kent Overstreet
commited 
Kent Overstreet
commited